Before reading this post, please see my 9/11 disclaimer.
Ever since writing a cover story on the Kennedy assassination for the November 21, 1988 New American, I have avoided addressing that topic. Kennedy assassination theories form a labyrinth littered with rabbit holes and red herrings.
However, the Internet has turned a computer into a Millennium Falcon that can access information at lightspeed.
It is increasingly clear that the Rothschilds have long been the world’s foremost “Power that Be,” and that Israel, the Rothschilds’ proxy state, has been the world’s leading generator of terrorism, despite mainstream media’s interminable parroting of Israel’s self-portrayal as “victim.”
If anyone would have had the power to assassinate the President of the United States, it was the Rothschild Zionist Establishment. Michael Collins Piper’s book Final Judgment, linking Israel to the Kennedy assassination, got a strong boost in 2004 when Israeli nuclear whistleblower Mordechai Vanunu stated that Kennedy was assassinated over his opposition to Israel’s nuclear weapons program.
Long before the Internet, one of the best resources in alternative media was Hilaire du Berrier’s intelligence newsletter, which he published out of Paris and Monaco from 1958 until his death in 2001. In his September 1963 newsletter du Berrier wrote:
Israel tested her first A-bomb in September, 1962, a product of the Beersheba plant in the Negev Desert. But the halting of this Beersheba plant was part of the package America agreed to deliver on the Test Ban Treaty’s signing. In late July American planes flew over the Israel reactor site at Dimona, as a reminder. The new government under Levi Eshkol did not push its protest. For actually, though Cairo, London, Paris and Brussels knew the details behind Ben-Gurion’s recent resignation, the American and Israeli publics are still in the dark. HERE IS WHAT HAPPENED: On the eve of the Harriman, Gromyko, Hailsham talks in Moscow, President Kennedy wrote a letter to Premier Ben-Gurion telling him to halt his atomic research and dismantle his plants. If he refused, a revision of America’s relations with Israel would be necessary. Literally, it was an ultimatum. Ben-Gurion looked over America’s financial aid and special laws favoring gifts and bequests to Israel and called it blackmail.1
It is noteworthy that this description of Ben-Gurion’s fury with Kennedy was not written in hindsight, but two months before the assassination.
The Zionist New World Order has long been obsessed with nuclear weapons. I learned much about this from reading David Dionisi’s book Atomic Bomb Secrets, which I have previously reviewed on this website. Dionisi’s focus is the 1945 atomic bombing of Nagaski, a criminally unnecessary act, since Japan had already asked to surrender on the very terms the United States subsequently accepted. Nagasaki was targeted because it was Japan’s Christian center, home to some 50,000 Christians. The “Fat Man” bomb that decimated Nagasaki was dropped directly over Urakami Cathedral, the largest Christian Cathedral in the Far East.
In ancient Canaan, child sacrifices were made to the satanic god Moloch:
Dionisi notes that satanists believe: when they conduct a human sacrifice, they draw power from the victim’s death. The bomb that killed over 70,000 at Nagasaki would be deemed empowering on a colossal scale. The same could be said of the fire-bombing of Dresden, which claimed hundreds of thousands of lives (the exact number has never been possible to determine); an atomic bomb would probably have been preferred, but was not yet ready.
While alternative media correctly regards 9/11 as a false flag intended to generate the domestic police state and never-ending Middle East wars, Dionisi notes the event had an additional dimension usually overlooked: the Twin Towers’ destruction constituted a ritual sacrifice, a burnt offering on a mass scale.
The New World Order’s upper levels are Luciferian, as has been described by intelligence analysts such as William Guy Carr (Canadian Intelligence Service), Ted Gunderson (FBI), and John Coleman (MI6). It is very evident in the Bohemian Grove “cremation of Care” ceremony taped by Alex Jones, in which the global elite engage in a mock human sacrifice (some say it is not mock) before a 40-foot statue of Moloch:
Luciferianism is on parade in the photos that have surfaced of a 1972 Rothschild-hosted ball:
Aside from its military public pretexts, the atomic bomb created the potential for human-sacrifice burnt offerings on an unprecedented scale. During World War II, the Zionist Establishment took great pains to transfer the new technology to the Soviet Union, which was the Rothschilds’ first proxy state; the nation of Israel did not yet exist.
In 1952, George Racey Jordan, a Lend-Lease expediter during the war, revealed the Roosevelt-Truman administration had shipped the Soviet Union both the blueprints and materials for making the atomic bomb. This high-level treason, done on express orders from Harry Hopkins (White House front man for Zionist bankster Bernard Baruch), was detailed in Jordan’s book From Major Jordan’s Diaries.
In his ignored 1994 book The Fifth Man, Roland Perry identified Victor Rothschild, one of Britain’s most powerful bankers, as the long-sought “Fifth Man” of the notorious Burgess-MacLean-Philby-Blunt spy ring. Former KGB officials confirmed Perry’s identification of Rothschild. As an inspector for MI5 (Britain’s equivalent of the FBI), Victor Rothschild had complete authority over state security during World War II. He passed Britain’s own atomic bomb secrets to the Soviet Union.
In 1948 the Israeli state was proclaimed, and by 1949 it had already initiated plans for developing atomic bombs.2 Ben-Gurion, Israel’s first prime minister, said: “What Einstein, Oppenheimer, and Teller, the three of them are Jews, made for the United States, could also be done by scientists in Israel, for their own people.”3 Today many analysts estimate that Israel has hundreds of nuclear weapons, but no one knows the true number, because Israel keeps its nuclear program an ironclad secret. The U.S. government doesn’t complain, which is ironic, since it demands that other Middle East nations maintain complete transparency about weapons, even starting the Iraq war in 2003 on the discredited pretext that Saddam Hussein was concealing WMDs.
Victor Rothschild was Jacob Rothschild’s father. Jacob and his cousin, Evelyn de Rothschild, are regarded by some as the two most influential men in the world today.
Evelyn de Rothschild is so powerful that he and his wife, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, honeymooned at the White House when Bill Clinton was President.4 Rumors have persisted in alternative media (as in this clip) that the pair had a “front-row” penthouse view of the World Trade Center’s destruction on 9/11.
Which brings us to this post’s heart, a matter that has begun gaining wider acceptance in alternative media: that 9/11 was a nuclear event.
If anyone doesn’t understand that Israel, along with cooperative American Zionists, were 9/11’s architects, I recommend reading this article.
Two days after 9/11, NBC’s Tom Brokaw interviewed Benjamin Netanyahu, who remarked:
In 1995 I wrote a book called Fighting Terrorism, and I said that if we don’t arrest the tide of militant Islamic terrorism, then the next thing that will be is not a car bomb in the World Trade Center, but a nuclear bomb.
Netanyahu, perhaps realizing he’d disclosed too much, elaborated:
Now it wasn’t a nuclear bomb, it was a 350-ton conventional bomb.
Here is the clip. The remarks begin at the 1:21 mark:
Even though Netanyahu revised “nuclear” to “conventional,” one must ask how he knew the bomb’s specific yield. In fact, how did he know it was a bomb at all? Supposedly plane crashes had brought the Towers down.
The solution to the Towers’ destruction was pioneered in a 2006 book entitled Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre by William Tahil. He demonstrated, for example, that WTC dust samples contained inexplicably high concentrations of elements produced by nuclear fission, such as strontium and barium. He also documented that seismology recordings displayed two enormous off-the-chart spikes consistent with explosion, not mere collapse.
Tahil’s conclusions are being corroborated, not only by the high cancer rates among 9/11 survivors, but through the fact that, by 2008, thyroid cancer was occurring at above-average frequency in first responders more than any other type of cancer (if clicking the link, see the SIR—Standardized Incidence Ratio—in Table 2). And by 2013, the number of first responders with thyroid cancer had nearly quadrupled from 26 to 97. Why is this significant? Because nuclear bombs emit iodine-131, which collects in the thyroid, often causing cancer. This is why some people keep potassium iodide tablets on hand—to protect their thyroid glands in case of a nuclear attack.
Many phenomena were consistent with nuclear explosion on 9/11. Tremendous explosive force was needed to hurl chunks of the World Trade Center, weighing multiple tons, hundreds of feet, such as this piece which impaled itself In the American Express building across the street:
Multi-ton sections flew some 600 feet, demolishing the Winter Garden Atrium:
Then there was the virtually complete vaporization of the Towers’ inner contents: no furniture, filing cabinets (except one), computers, or toilets survived. All turned into dust. Even the buildings’ concrete became dust, instead of falling as chunks of debris. The vaporization, of course, included the humans inside (whole bodies that were found belonged to people who jumped before the Towers exploded):
Not only is a nuclear bomb the most powerful explosive known, its blast—unlike conventional explosives—endures for several seconds, enabling it to inflict considerably more damage.
A common objection to the nuclear hypothesis is: “Where are the post-9/11 Geiger counter readings showing lots of radiation in New York City?” The answer: not all nuclear bombs discharge large amounts of radiation. Most use a combination of nuclear fission and fusion; if the fission is high, fallout (radiation) will be high; but if fission is low compared to fusion, fallout will be low.
The Free Dictionary defines a “clean bomb” as “an atom bomb leaving little or no radioactive contamination.” During the Cold War, the United States began developing tactical nuclear weapons, also known as “battlefield nukes.” Obviously, in a battlefield situation, a low-radiation weapon is desired; otherwise it could harm one’s own army.
The Davy Crockett recoilless gun fired an M388 atomic round:
The nuclear warheads the Davy Crockett fired had a yield of only 10 to 20 tons,5 far less than the 350 tons mentioned by Netanyahu. A modern suitcase nuke is small enough to carry in a backpack.
What types of nuclear warheads would Israel stockpile? Although this is a state secret, it should be obvious that Israel would emphasize “battlefield” nukes. In war with its neighbors, it wouldn’t want radiation blowback to Tel Aviv.
It is interesting that the site of the Towers’ destruction was called “Ground Zero,” which my 1994 Webster’s New World Dictionary defines as “the land or water surface area directly below or above the point of detonation of a nuclear bomb.”
The Towers’ “collapses” were clearly explosions. Here is a shot of the South Tower showing a huge single upward burst of energy:
The North Tower explodes:
Tactical nuke exploding:
Here the same bomb creates an expanding ground-level cloud, similar to what New Yorkers fled from on 9/11:
For a full view of the explosion, watch from 2:36 to 3:02 of the following clip posted by ZiG ZAG (the entire video is of explosions of tactical nukes of various types and strength):
For comparison, here is a clip of the 9/11 dust cloud. Is this simply from “a building falling down”?
On 9/11, much of a nuclear blast, hitting mass above the “airplane strike” damage, would have begun dispersing through the Tower’s gashes. This is probably why it made no classic mushroom cloud that is a signature of atomic bombs. Nonetheless, as Tahil noted, the remaining plume was quite like that left by nuclear detonation:
If someone was going to place a nuclear bomb in the World Trade Center, where would they put it? In his 1995 book Fighting Terrorism, Netanyahu dropped a hint that he didn’t mention to Brokaw:
In the worst of such scenarios, the consequences could be not a car bomb but a nuclear bomb in the basement of the World Trade Center.6 [Italics in original text]
OK, the basement. But where in the basement?
If, as Netanyahu implied, there was one bomb per Tower, a logical place for suitcase nukes would have been the buildings’ deepest points: the service pits beneath Elevator 50, the only elevator that (1) ran the entire length of either Tower, and (2) went to the Towers’ lowest level, Sublevel B6. It was also close to each building’s center. Elevator 50 is colored blue in the schematic below; reference https://sites.google.com/site/911stories/wtcelevatorshafts.
This position would have created a virtual “launching pad” for a nuke; surrounding bedrock would have largely contained the blast’s sideways/downward force. The main force would have followed the path of least resistance—upwards through the hole in the bedrock, its expanding energy surging fastest through the elevator shaft until hitting mass above the “airplane strike” zone.
This scenario might also resolve the mysterious damage to other World Trade Center buildings.
The Rest of the WTC: Nuclear Residual through Underground Pipes?
Building 5 was set ablaze (video clip here):
Here is Building 6 from overhead, with a huge crater that went to the lowest basement level:
Then there is the notorious Building 7, whose raging fires are seen in this clip:
When did these fires start? It could not have been before the Towers’ destruction. Otherwise, video of the burning Towers would have shown additional smoke plumes, cameras would have panned to the blazes, and news announcers would have said, “We seem to have yet another building on fire.” Some have suggested these fires resulted from bombs set off simultaneously as the Towers exploded. Yet given the terrorists’ success in bringing down the Towers, why would they fail to collapse the smaller WTC buildings (except for Building 7 at 5:20 PM, in an obvious controlled demolition)?
Nuclear blasts originating at the Twin Towers’ lowest levels may provide the answer. Underneath the World Trade Center, the buildings were interconnected by pipes, not only for sewage, but a storm water drainage system. Reading the World Trade Center Property Risk Report prepared for owner Larry Silverstein:
Roof drains and leaders convey the storm water by gravity to the various building drains, located on level B-1, which connect to the 36-inch storm watch drain that discharges into the Hudson River. The subsurface water and the machinery drips are drained into the various sump pits located in level B-6. The sump pumps discharge the clear water into two 36-inch storm water drains on level B-1.7
Any building’s place at greatest risk for flooding is its lowest point. For the Twin Towers, this would have been Elevator 50’s service pits, which, as we’ve seen, were carved into the bedrock beneath the lowest basement level, B-6. From here flood water would be pumped through pipes to the 36-inch storm drain. Thus atomic blasts here would not only follow the path of least resistance up through Elevator 50’s shaft, but up into the 36-inch storm water drain system. Starting at the following video’s 13-second mark, one can see overpressure bursting up in two geysers at the northern garage ramp, first as steam, then as smoke, before becoming engulfed in dust from the Tower:
For the record, here is a still with the two geysers highlighted:
The WTC’s storm water apparently drained through two systems, one linked to each Tower. Quoting Eric Darton’s 1999 book Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York’s World Trade Center:
Port Authority engineers ended up designing a dual sewerage system for the trade center . . . . Storm sewage from the west side of the complex—the Vista Hotel, Tower One, and the Customs building [WTC 6]—drains into the Hudson, as does the trade center’s air conditioning runoff. A pipeline was eventually built that channels the remainder of the waste water to the Newton Creek plant, on the border of Brooklyn and Queens.8
Thus the secondary force of a nuclear blast from the first (South) Tower could have propagated through the underground pipes and shot up through buildings 5 and 7, igniting them, and from the North Tower to Building 6. Building 7’s fires were less devastating—it was more distant and taller. As Trade Center garages were also connected to the drainage system, they would have been burned too, accounting for the “toasted cars.”
Falling debris could not have caused the raging internal fires seen in the smaller buildings. Earlier in this post we saw edifices outside the World Trade Center (American Express Building, Winter Garden Atrium) that were heavily impacted by debris, but they did not catch fire. THEY WERE NOT CONNECTED TO THE WTC’S UNDERGROUND DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
As is well known in the 9/11 Truth community, less than two months before the attacks, the World Trade Center came under new management for the first time in its history. Larry Silverstein and his partners purchased a 99-year lease for $124 million. After the tragedy he received an insurance payout of nearly $5 billion. Lucky Larry also managed to avoid being at the World Trade Center on 9/11 due to a fortuitous doctor’s appointment.
Silverstein is also great friends with Benjamin Netanyahu who, as we have seen, had predicted a nuclear bomb would be placed in the World Trade Center. The Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported in November 2001:
The two have been on friendly terms since Netanyahu’s stint as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations. For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein. It made no difference what the subject was or where Netanyahu was, he would always call, Silverstein told an Israeli acquaintance. Their ties continued after Netanyahu became prime minister.9
As the World Trade Center’s brand-new owner, Silverstein could easily have given Israeli agents with suitcase nukes access to the Twin Tower basements.
Silverstein is famous for his “pull it” remark regarding Building 7, the “smoking gun” of 9/11. But might Larry have had an even bigger smoking gun had he not pulled it? According to Building 7 survivor Barry Jennings (an emergency coordinator for the New York Housing Authority), an enormous explosion in 7 destroyed the lower part of the stairs he and a colleague were descending in a stairwell. They retreated upstairs and were eventually rescued by the fire department. Jennings described intense heat, and stepping over dead bodies on the way out of the building’s blown-out lobby.10 Perhaps for Silverstein, pulling the building was better than having to explain all those mysterious office fires and corpses, which did not fit the official narrative.
Much has been discussed about the entertainment industry’s innumerable pre-9/11 predictions.
No film reeks of 9/11 symbolism more than Back to the Future, from Marty’s DeLorean leaving a glowing “911,” to Biff watching a simulated Twin Towers collapse in Back to the Future 2. Director Robert Zemeckis later made a movie about the Twin Towers called The Walk, released in October 2015, the same year and month Marty traveled ahead to in the future. I won’t embed it here, but this 12-minute clip nicely summarizes Back to the Future’s 9/11 predictions.
However, a widely overlooked feature of its foreshadowing is the nuclear element. Here’s Doc explaining to Marty how he powers the flux capacitor:
Doc: Unfortunately no, it requires something with a little more kick, plutonium.
Marty: Uh, plutonium, wait a minute, are you telling me that this sucker’s nuclear?
Then there’s the bumper sticker on Doc’s car:
I acknowledge that this brief Hollywood digression in no way “proves” the Twin Towers were nuked. It’s supplemental, for whatever it may be worth.
Implications for the Truth Movement?
Might Tahil’s work on nuclear demolition have alarmed the 9/11 perpetrators, resulting in alternative theories of the WTC collapse, for the purpose of creating cognitive dissonance? I don’t know when in 2006 Tahil’s book was published, but in late 2006 Dr. Judy Wood proposed Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs) and Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth was established (proposing nano-thermite). (In making this remark, I intend no insult to followers of either camp, who include many sincere and intelligent individuals.)
This summer, during his book tour, I had the pleasure of meeting Chris Bollyn, one of 9/11’s best researchers. In this interview, starting at about the 42-minute mark, Chris states a Mossad agent approached him in Germany and tried to sell him on the “beam weapons” thesis, long before Judy Wood got on board with it. Dr. Woods’ DEWs, which she initially called “Star Wars Beam Weapons,” took Israelis off the hook for 9/11, since they wouldn’t have had a space-based weapon.
Kevin Ryan, who, along with Dr. Steven Jones, is a leading nano-thermite proponent, exonerates Israel as well, in his book Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects. After 312 pages, he writes:
Israel has also been discussed in terms of the possibility that elements of its government were involved. Unfortunately, such claims are often made without supporting evidence and coherent reasoning. Although there is evidence that Israeli intelligence knew details about the attacks in advance—the story of the “Dancing Israelis” verified this foreknowledge—many governments had advance knowledge of the attacks as indicated by the warnings received.11
Looking at Ryan’s suspect list in his chapter headings—Cheney, Rumsfeld, Freeh, Tenet, Clarke, Canavan, Sliney, Eberhart, Truscott, Jenkins, Walker, McDaniel, Giuliani, etc.—he somehow missed the innumerable Israeli/Zionist links to 9/11. There is virtually no overlap. His book never once mentions Dov “missing 2.3 trillion” Zakheim, comptroller of the Pentagon. Larry Silverstein is noted only in passing—no discussion of Lucky Larry’s $5 billion insurance payout or doctor’s appointment on 9/11.
The “plane strikes”
Although this post has primarily addressed the use of nukes of 9/11, its conclusions necessitate briefly discussing what actually struck the Twin Towers as “airplanes” that day.
Lack of physical evidence at the Pentagon and Shanksville has long left doubt that any planes hit them at all. Many people are beginning to realize that the Twin Towers weren’t struck by jetliners either. Whatever hit the South Tower was traveling at 590 miles per hour,12 speed impossible for a Boeing 767 to attain at ground level; even if it did, it would have been uncontrollable, as demonstrated by Pilots for 9/11 Truth in this 6-minute clip.
Then, of course, are the impossible physics displayed in news footage of Flight 175 vanishing into the South Tower, its fragile aluminum wings and tail slicing through the 14-inch steel columns “like a hot knife through butter.” For those new to 9/11 Truth, there are innumerable posts and videos about this; I’ll embed a quick clip here:
Many believe the images of aircraft hitting the Towers were CGI (computer-generated imagery) made after the fact. However, Richard Hall has produced a compelling video demonstrating that, in all South Tower strike footage, filmed from many angles, the object followed the precise same trajectory. This indicates a real object hit the Tower. Hall concludes it was a missile shrouded in a plane’s image. I won’t embed the 30-minute video, but click here if you wish to view.
The declassified 1987 Defense Department paper Critical Technology Assessment in Israel and NATO Nations noted that the Israeli firm El-Op was then already developing holographic technology with “stealth applications.”
Hologram tech is real. It can make deceased performers “come to life” on stage:
Military implications are obvious. The U.S. Air Force developed an airborne holographic projector years ago:
When Chris Bollyn was on his 9/11 speaking tour this summer, I asked his opinion of the “no planes” theory. Chris said that on images of Flight 175’s underside, you can see a missile; its nose lights up when it meets the building. (This is much discussed in the 9/11 movement.) Chris asked: if it was only a hologram, why would they bother including a missile image? Chris’s conclusion was that missile-carrying drones hit the Towers.
However, I didn’t understand how a drone could fly through steel any more than a jetliner. Although I am not wedded to the idea, Hall’s conclusion may resolve the dilemma: perhaps the missile was real, but the “airplane” was not. Unlike jetliner noses, which are so soft they have been crumpled by bird collisions, a missile’s nose is hardened and designed for penetration. With advanced holographic technology, a missile could easily project a plane image around itself. The sound people heard may have been a cruise missile instead of a Boeing 767. I have no idea where the missiles would have been launched, but it’s interesting that Israel began commissioning her first Dolphin-class submarines in 1999.
9/11 may actually have been a comparatively simple operation: four cruise missiles cloaked as aircraft, one of which had to be ditched in Shanksville; and two suitcase nukes in the Twin Towers’ deepest shafts.
We haven’t discussed many other aspects of 9/11 here: fates of the original passengers and planes, which I probed in an earlier post; the basement explosions heard in the Twin Towers during “plane” impact; and evidence for pre-planted explosives and thermite at the impact levels. But we can only address so much in an article.
What about the Future?
The goal of the Rothschild “Powers that Be” has long been an all-powerful one-world government. It was for this purpose that the Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers and Trilateral Commission were established. Regional consolidations such as the EU and NAFTA were designed as stepping stones to an ultimate world government.
Zionism has always been enmeshed with world government. This should surprise no one, since the Rothschilds have been the driving financial force behind both. Here is Israel’s first prime minister, Ben-Gurion, calling for a “New World Order” at the 1945 World Zionist Congress:
The world government’s center would be Jerusalem. Ben-Gurion predicted this in Look magazine in 1962 (below). A larger-font transcript can be read here.
Ben Gurion’s reference to a “Supreme Court of Mankind” in Jerusalem would startle no one familiar with “The Roots of Evil in Jersualem,” a description of the Luciferian architecture of the Rothschild-funded Israeli Supreme Court.
We should make no mistake—world government would be cruel, totalitarian, and ruled by a figure the Bible calls the “beast” or “Antichrist.” Revelation 13:7 says “he was given authority over every tribe, people, language and nation.” To govern the world, the Antichrist would need a world government. The Bible likewise warns he will rule from a (rebuilt) temple in Jerusalem; e.g.:
Don’t let anyone deceive you in any way, for that day will not come until the rebellion occurs and the man of lawlessness is revealed, the man doomed to destruction. He will oppose and exalt himself over everything that is called God or is worshipped, so that he sets himself up in God’s temple, proclaiming himself to be God. (2 Thessalonians 2:3-4)
World Wars have been the primary catalysts of the Rothschild plan. World War I generated the first try at world government, the League of Nations, as well as the Balfour declaration, which the British government issued to Lord Walter Rothschild, pledging a “Jewish homeland” in Palestine. World War II produced a stronger framework for world government—the UN—and the Israeli state. But the plan’s culmination (total world government, seated in Jerusalem) would probably require a World War III.
What sort of false flag might trigger World War III? It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to understand that another World War would inevitably involve nuclear weapons. And here Israel’s secrecy concerning the number and size of her nukes becomes extremely troubling. According to the declassified 1987 Defense Department report, the United States assisted Israel in developing hydrogen bombs. Why would Israel need H-bombs?
Israel’s very identity seems intertwined with nuclear weapons. Even Wikipedia says Ben-Gurion was “nearly obsessed” with them.13 What is the purpose of these weapons? 9/11 demonstrated offensive use. They obviously aren’t for defense because, after 9/11, the U.S. military squandered its resources eliminating Israel’s viable enemies in the region—Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and now Syria. Only Iran remains.
If, in fact, missiles were cloaked as jetliners for the 9/11 false flag, it raises a disturbing possibility. To instigate World War III, perhaps Israel would launch a high-yield nuclear missile against America, this time cloaked as a Russian bomber. Or a nuclear missile against Russia, cloaked as a U.S. bomber. Either way, the Zionists might get their Third World War.
The question would then become: How far would this World War go? While I realize Hollywood has limited predictive value, I will reference it here, only because it has modeled the possibilities. In 1964, two major films depicted nuclear war between America and Russia: Fail Safe (drama) and Dr. Strangelove (dark comedy). Their endings were very different, but equally bizarre. Columbia pictures produced both films, which even shared screenwriter Peter George (died 1966).
In Fail Safe, a computer glitch causes a U.S. bomber squadron to nuke Moscow, despite all efforts by the President and Pentagon to recall it. To appease Russia and ensure no all-out war destroys humanity, the President orders the U.S. Air Force to nuke New York City; as Ground Zero they use the Empire State Building, the city’s tallest building before the Twin Towers, whose design plan was publicly revealed that same year, 1964. (Makes one think twice about the original A-bomb program being named “The Manhattan Project.”)
In Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb, a rogue American general launches a first strike on Russia, and here again, the Pentagon and President cannot stop it. In this film’s ending, the entire world is nuked; the audience watches a gallery of nuclear explosions while the song “We’ll Meet Again” plays. Dr. Strangelove has told us, however, that the world’s leaders and elite will escape the disaster by going underground, reminiscent of the DUMBs (deep underground military bases) discussed in alternative media.
Many believe that the German-accented character Dr. Strangelove was based on Henry Kissinger.
Dr. Strangelove was played by Peter Sellers, who had three roles in the film. Sellers had previously played three roles in another film about nuclear weapons—the Mouse that Roared (1959), in which a tiny country rules the world after stealing a powerful American weapon (the “Q bomb”) from . . . New York City. That film’s thesis seems like a parable for Israel. For just as the gun was called “the great equalizer,” the atomic bomb is an equalizer making small countries as formidable as the large.
Which are the Rothschild elite planning? The Strangelove option (nuke the planet) or Fail Safe option (limited nuclear war)? I believe it is probably the latter. If they intended all-out nuclear war, why bother with police-state surveillance, chemtrails, vaccines, false-flag shootings, and the host of other ills inflicted upon us? Why not just nuke the planet and be done with it? And how can you have a world government without a world?
While either scenario would produce a burnt offering to Satan on an unprecedented scale, a Fail Safe limited war could frighten humanity into accepting world government from fear of a Dr. Strangelove outcome.
When might this happen? Trying to predict the future is a great way to end up with egg on your face. However, I am concerned about 2017.
The Rothschild-owned magazine The Economist is notorious for its annual predictive cover. “The World in 2017” cover displays Tarot cards including a “death” card with a nuclear bomb exploding.
2017 has many anniversaries for the Rothschild elite to celebrate. Here’s a graphic I occasionally Tweet:
If I was Rothschild, and was sentimental, my ideal date in 2017 might be March 11, Purim, the holiday when Jews celebrate being delivered from their enemies—and celebrate slaughtering them.
What would be the best way to prevent an atomic holocaust? One thing Israel and its Rothschild patrons fear is military might. Neither American nor Russian generals want a nuclear nightmare. I believe Vladimir Putin would do well to warn Netanyahu that, in the event of an Israeli-schemed nuclear false flag, Tel Aviv would be first on the hit list.
Along with strategic hopes, we need to turn to God, and do a lot of praying. As a chaplain famously said at Pearl Harbor that Sunday morning, “Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.”
- H. du B Reports, September, 1963, pp. 5-6.
- “Nuclear Weapons and Israel,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel.
- Jeffrey Goldberg, “The Point of No Return,” The Atlantic, September, 2010, https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2010/09/the-point-of-no-return/308186/.
- Nicole Goodkind, “Donald Trump Has Gamed the System His Whole Life: Lady Rothschild,” Yahoo! Finance, October 5, 2016, https://finance.yahoo.com/news/donald-trump-has-gamed-the-system-his-whole-life-lady-rothschild-183745584.html.
- “Little Shots—The Cold War’s Smallest Nukes,” Military History Now, October 21, 2013, https://militaryhistorynow.com/2013/10/21/little-shots-the-cold-wars-smallest-nukes/.
- Benjamin Netanyahu, Fighting Terrorism: How Democracies Can Defeat Domestic and International Terrorists (New York: Farrar Straus Giroux, 1995), 125.
- World Trade Center Property Risk Report, Prepared for Silverstein Properties, Inc., (New York: Alternative Insurance Works, September 19, 2000), p. 11, https://info.publicintelligence.net/wtcinsurancerisk.pdf.
- Eric Darton, Divided We Stand: A Biography of New York’s World Trade Center (New York: Basic Books, 1999; 2011 edition), p. 158.
- Sara Leibovich-Dar, “Up in Smoke,” Haaretz, November 21, 2001, https://www.haaretz.com/up-in-smoke-1.75334.
- Aaron Dykes, “Key Witness to WTC 7 Explosions Dead at 53,” Infowars, September 16, 2008, https://www.infowars.com/key-witness-to-wtc-7-explosions-on-911-dead-at-53/.
- Kevin Robert Ryan, Another Nineteen: Investigating Legitimate 9/11 Suspects (Microbloom, 2013), p. 312.
- “United Airlines Flight 175,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Airlines_Flight_175.
- Nuclear Weapons and Israel,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_weapons_and_Israel.