“Eat Ze Bugs”—Climate Change and the War against Humanity

This post, like many of my recent ones, utilizes graphics and ultra-short videos (1-3 minutes) to get its message across, as I know many people are often pressed for time. I’ve marked the length of videos, rounded off. Although rare, a few people in the past have reported difficulty playing videos embedded from sites other than YouTube. If such a video doesn’t play for you, be sure to click it a second time. If it still doesn’t play, I list an offsite backup where the video can also be watched. At the post’s end, you’ll find longer videos for those who wish to explore Climate Change more in-depth. Thanks to those who supplied memes (the ones with voice balloons are mine).

First Things First

Most of my readers already know this, and can skip this section, but for those few who don’t, in reality America, and many other countries, are chiefly run by wealthy oligarchs (often called “the Deep State”) who conceal themselves behind the façade of “democracy.” Voting gives the public the illusion that “the people” are in charge. Over the decades, through the power of wealth, the oligarchs have consolidated their domination of governments, industry, banks and media. It may be stated categorically that these oligarchs have long sought to establish a world government. The most visible global center of the oligarchy appears to be Klaus Schwab’s World Economic Forum (WEF), about which I have written an extensive post.

I have summarized the oligarchs’ activities in my books The Shadows of Power, Truth Is a Lonely Warrior, 13 Pieces of the Jigsaw, and COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red-Pilled, as well as numerous posts on this website.

With the COVID lockdown, the oligarchs began accelerating their agendas. I believe this was because they thought they had reached the point where their control of mainstream media, “big tech” (YouTube, FaceBook, Google) and politicians had become so consolidated and monolithic that the Deep State could establish anything as a “new normal”—they knew that no major news outlets or politicians would contradict the narrative, no matter how illogical or destructive. As pictures are worth a thousand words, here’s an example of media control (2 minutes):

And an example of political control (2 minutes):


My, How Easily They Change the Narratives

Dr. Vernon Coleman summarizes some of the mistaken predictions climate alarmists have plagued us with over the years:

The global warming loonies don’t seem to be aware that we’ve always had weather and there have always been loonies warning that the end of the world is nigh. In 1817, the President of the Royal Society in London warned that there had been a considerable change of climate that would lead to massive changes. In 1947, a Swedish geophysicist warned that the climate was warming up. In the 1970s, the BBC, that perennial source of misinformation, warned of an oncoming ice age—as big a threat to life as a nuclear war. In 2007 we were warned that we had five years to save the planet. In 2011, the International Energy Agency said we had five years left. In 2017, the United Nations said we had three years left. In 2013, a Cambridge professor said all the Arctic ice would be gone by 2015. In 2009, Gordon Brown, then UK PM, took time off from buggering up the economy to tell us we had 50 days left. Back in 2004, the Observer newspaper told us that we’d be living in a Siberian climate by 2020. Eleven years ago, Prince Charles said we had eight years left to save the planet.1

Here’s Leonard Nimoy in a 1978 In Search of episode on “The Coming Ice Age” (2 minute-clip):

(video is backed up here)

Time magazine covers demonstrate how it transformed from “Global Cooling” to “Global Warming”

Global warming alarmists almost never mention the good effects of a warm climate; given adequate water, warm regions produce the lushest vegetation and most crops.

 A Well-Coordinated Global Agenda Suddenly Emerges

For nearly three years the principal focus of politicians and media has been COVID-19, with its unprecedented “new normals,” including: forced masking of healthy, asymptomatic people; “social distancing”; shuttering of small businesses and churches; and vaccinations—often mandatory—with experimental mRNA gene therapy.

(Well before the mRNA rollout, my book COVID-19 and the Agendas to Come, Red-Pilled, published in August 2020, was intermittently Amazons #1 best-seller in the category of “respiratory diseases” until they censored the book after less than 2 months. I have posted updates on this website here, here, and here, and may update it a fourth time.)

Although “global warming” and “Climate Change” had been propagandized for years, the claim of Climate Change as a catastrophic planet-wide emergency—requiring drastic “new normals” in our behavior (similar to COVID, restrictions on freedoms based on “science”)—accelerated almost overnight, as this 1-minute video demonstrates:

(video is backed up here)

Here, from the World Economic Forum’s annual meeting of January 2023, WEF spokesmen confirm that CLIMATE is what now drives globalization (2 minutes):

(video backed up here)

Here is more of that undercover video recorded by Project Veritas, in which CNN Tech Director Charlie Chester admitted that the next fear crisis his network would promote would be Climate Change (3 minutes):

(video backed up here)

(article here)

Bill Gates, Grand Master of the COVID crisis, weighs in on the “carbon crisis” (1 minute):

(video backed up here)

Justin Trudeau has of of course jumped on the “Climate Change” wagon, even though the average annual temperature in Canada is below 0 degrees centigrade, hardly seeming to make Canada a major risk for “global warming.”

As part of the fear porn, some news stations have colored warm temperatures red—implying a dread “global warming” heat wave—whereas they formerly used green to depict the same temperatures:

As with COVID-19 and the Ukraine War, only views concurring with the “official narrative” are permitted by mainstream news, and only critics opposing it are scrutinized by “fact-checkers.”

To Frighten the Public, Climate Change is Blamed for a Host of Problems, Some of Which Coincided with the mRNA Vaccine Rollout

Climate Change, Global Warming—Real or Not?

John Coleman, founder of the Weather Channel, absolutely sticks it to CNN —a video worth the label “must watch” (2 minutes):

(video backed up here)

Cartoon by Antonio Branco

The graph below is from the video presentation by Nobel Prize recipient Ivar Giaever (see the section “For More In-Depth Research” near the end of this post).

A broader look, demonstrating the cyclical nature of global temperatures:

If the model of approximately 60-year cycles is correct, we could expect temperatures to dip again in the 2030s—60 years after the “ice age” scare of the 1970s. This, of course, would enable governments to claim that their restrictions on carbon emissions were “working.”

Original article here.

Who could forget the “polar vortex” that struck Texas for eight days in February 2021, bringing snow and ice, freezing wind turbines, and leaving more than 4.5 million homes and businesses without electrical power?2,3

Please note that the meme below is strictly satirical, but makes its point:

But Is the Weather Changing?

Floods, droughts, hurricanes, tornados and blizzards have always been around.

The disastrous American prairie dust bowl of the 1930s is a great historical example. But today, the media seems to exploit nearly all severe weather events by attributing them to “Climate Change.”

According to this graph (CRED is the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters), there has been no significant increase in global weather and climate disasters over the past two decades:

However, is it possible that modern technology sometimes “helps” weather to accelerate in severity, to convince the public that Climate Change is real? Knowing the oligarchy’s lack of integrity, this wouldn’t surprise us.

In 1962, Vice President (future President) Lyndon Baines Johnson declared that “He who controls the weather controls the world.” (1 minute):

In his 1970 book Between Two Ages, Zbigniew Brzezinski quoted geophysicist Gordon J. F. MacDonald:

Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storms, thereby weakening a nation’s capacity and forcing it to accept the demands of the competitor.4

In 1972, the United States and Russia signed a weather treaty. It forbade inducing tidal waves, earthquakes and tornadoes, among other phenomena.5

Some may wish to consult the 44-page 1996 Air Force report Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, which discussed numerous ways in which weather could be controlled to defeat enemies. Quoting the report:

“According to Gen Gordon Sullivan, former Army chief of staff, “As we leap technology into the 21st century, we will be able to see the enemy day or night, in any weather—and go after him relentlessly.” Global, precise, real-time, robust, systematic weather-modification capability would provide war-fighting CINCs with a powerful force multiplier to achieve military objectives. Since weather will be common to all possible futures, a weather-modification capability would be universally applicable and have utility across the entire spectrum of conflict. The capability of influencing the weather even on a small scale could change it from a force degrader to a force multiplier.” . . . .

In the broadest sense, weather-modification can be divided into two major categories: suppression and intensification of weather patterns. In extreme cases, it might involve the creation of completely new weather patterns, attenuation or control of severe storms, or even alteration of global climate on a far-reaching and/or long-lasting scale.6

In the past, CBS News openly discussed weather modification (3 minutes):

When something like a tornado or hurricane occurs, it is usually very difficult to prove whether or not the event might have been generated or enhanced by geoengineering.

But some recent events have clearly been abnormal, such as the Santa Rosa, California fire of 2017, and the Paradise, California fire of 2018, which disintegrated entire houses, even melting their granite countertops, but did not burn the trees outside the houses, as any “forest fire” should do. Many videos demonstrated this; here’s a sample from Paradise (7 minutes):

(A 22-minute video of the Santa Rosa anomalies may be seen here.)

It has been theorized in alternative media that such fires are caused by Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). I am friends with a research scientist who participated in the groundwork for the U.S. Directed Energy Weapons system. Although he did not stay on until the end of the project, he told me that his colleagues confirmed to him that it had been completed.

I don’t intend to dwell on geoengineering in this post, but those interested may wish to consult: the article “Weather Warfare” by Peter Koenig (former senior analyst at the World Bank); the extensive document Global WAR-NING! Geoengineering Is Wrecking Our Planet and Humanity, edited by Dr. Claudia von Werlhof (Professor Emeritus at the University of Innsbruck, Austria), with contributions by multiple authors; and/or the website Geoengineering Watch.

The War on Carbon Dioxide

People and animals breathe in air (mostly oxygen and nitrogen), and they breathe out carbon dioxide. It’s a natural process that’s been going on for eons. In photosynthesis, plants absorb carbon dioxide along with sunlight, enabling them to break down sugars and grow.

This natural cycle of life is now under attack by the depopulation-obsessed globalists and their hired political, academic and media minions, who claim carbon dioxide is a major villain behind “global warming.” And this makes us—people (and animals)—villains too, simply for breathing, or for driving gasoline-powered automobiles, leaving too big of a “carbon footprint.” As we have already seen, there is no authentic global warming threat, but even if there was, would carbon dioxide cause it?

Dr. Claudia Von Werlhof (previously referenced) stated in an interview:

The question is how we define climate change and its alleged reason, of which it is said is CO2. We consider climate change, at least in the official discussion, as “global warming” and this global warming doesn’t exist.

There are data from NASA, which is the North American Space Agency, and they show that in the last 18 years there was no general global warming. . . . there are about 30,000 scientists in the US now who say that there is no problem with CO2. On the contrary, CO2 is a gas that stems from rotten natural materials which is needed by the plants to transform it into oxygen. They say that CO2 is not at all detrimental for the climate, and that it even is something we are to welcome and that we need for our trees and plantsand as a positive effect.

So, the funny thing is that CO2 is often shown as some dirt, as if it was a dirt in the air. Then you look at the factories that are shown in this opportunity, you see the dust coming out of them, etc. This is not CO2. CO2 is a gas that is invisible and doesn’t smell so you don’t see it.

In general, the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is about 0.038 % only. Most of that is vapour, water vapour, some 80 or 70%. So, this tiny amount of CO2 cannot change something huge like the climate of this planet. This is impossible.7

As F. William Engdahl noted in New Eastern Outlook:

Around the turn of the millennium as the previous solar-led warming cycle was no longer evident, Al Gore and others shifted the narrative in a linguistic sleight-of-hand to “Climate Change,” from Global Warming. Now the fear narrative has gotten so absurd that every freak weather event is treated as “climate crisis.” Every hurricane or winter storm is claimed as proof that the Climate Gods are punishing us sinful CO2 emitting humans.

But wait. The entire reason for the transition to alternative energy sources such as solar or wind, and abandoning carbon energy sources, is their claim that CO2 is a greenhouse gas that somehow goes up to the atmosphere where it forms a blanket that supposedly warms the Earth below—Global Warming. Greenhouse gas emissions according to the US Environmental Protection Agency come mostly from CO2. Hence the focus on “carbon footprints.”

What is almost never said is that CO2 cannot soar up into the atmosphere from car exhaust or coal plants or other manmade origins. Carbon dioxide is not carbon or sootIt is an invisible, odorless gas essential to plant photosynthesis and all life forms on earth, including us. CO2 has a molecular weight of just over 44 while air (mainly oxygen and nitrogen) has a molecular weight of only 29.

The specific gravity of CO2 is some 1.5 times greater than air. That would suggest that CO2 exhaust gases from vehicles or power plants do not rise into the atmosphere some 12 miles or more above Earth to form the feared greenhouse effect.8

Patrick Moore, one of the original founders of Greenpeace, entirely rejects the idea of CO2-drive Climate Change:

Very few people believe the world is not warming. The record is clear that the world has been warming since about the year 1700, 150 years before we were using fossil fuels. 1700 was the peak of the Little Ice Age, which was very cold and caused crop failures and starvation. Before that, around 1000 A.D. was the Medieval Warm period when Vikings farmed Greenland. [And] before that, around 500 A.D. were the Dark Ages, and before that, the Roman Warm Period when it was warmer than today. . . .

Even until about 1950, the amount of fossil fuel used and CO2 emitted were very small compared to today. We do not know the cause of these periodic fluctuations in temperature, but it was certainly not CO2.9

The War on Cars

The European Union has banned the sale of new gasoline and diesel-driven cars beginning in 2035. California has also banned the sale of gas-driven cars starting in 2035, and other states plan to follow suit, including New York, Massachusetts and Washington.

When one considers that the average cost of a new electric car (EV) is about $65,000, this hardly has appeal in a cash-strapped economy.

EV batteries are not designed to be recycled. Furthermore, a used car with a battery at the end of its life has little resale value, as a replacement battery can cost the new buyer $10,000 or more.10

Then there’s the enormous drain EV batteries put on Earth’s resources. As Kent Moss writes:

To manufacture each E.V. auto battery, the following material must be processed: 25,000 pounds of brine for the lithium, 30,000 pounds of ore for the cobalt, 5,000 pounds of ore for the nickel, and 25,000 pounds of ore for copper. All told, suppliers must dig up 500,000 pounds of the earth’s crust for just one battery.11

Eco Central notes:

While the shift to electric cars reflects ongoing efforts to reduce the world’s dependence on fossil fuels, the UN warns that the raw materials used to produce electric car batteries are highly concentrated in a small number of countries and their extraction and refinement pose a serious threat to the environment.

The U.N. trade body, UNCTAD, has issued a new report breaking down some of the unintended negative consequences of the shift, which include ecological degradation as well as human rights abuses.

The report notes that metals such as cobalt, lithium, manganese, copper, and minerals like graphite “play a significant role in energy-related technologies such as rechargeable batteries that are used in a variety of applications ranging from electronics to electric vehicles as well as in renewable energies such as nuclear, wind, and solar power.”

Several of these raw materials are quite rare and have few or no substitutes and they come from specific areas of the globe. More than half the world’s supply of lithium, for example, a key component of lithium-ion batteries, comes from beneath the salt flats in the Andean region of Chile, Bolivia, and Argentina.12

And where do EV charging stations get their energy from? Certainly not from solar panels or wind turbines. They get it mostly from fossil fuels, the very thing we’re supposed to be so concerned about. Even though the charging stations themselves do not directly give off emissions, they could strain the already hard-pressed power grid. Mainstream media almost never mentions this irony. Again, Eco Central elaborates:

Last December, a prominent professor at the Copenhagen Business School said that attempts to rein in global warming by driving electric cars were nothing other than “pointless virtue signaling.”

“It is absurd for middle-class citizens in advanced economies to tell themselves that eating less steak or commuting in a Toyota TM-0.18% Prius will rein in rising temperatures,” stated Bjørn Lomborg, the director of the Copenhagen Consensus Center and author of The Skeptical Environmentalist.

“Although I am a vegetarian and don’t own a car, I believe we need to be honest about what such choices can achieve,” Lomborg declared.

Although electric cars are “branded as environmentally friendly,” the fact is that “generating the electricity they require almost always involves burning fossil fuels,” he stated.

“Moreover, producing energy-intensive batteries for these cars invariably generates significant CO2 emissions,” he wrote, so that electric cars have a huge carbon deficit when they hit the road, and “will start saving emissions only after being driven 60,000 kilometers.”13

Finally, the war on car emissions may also be implemented to restrict your right to travel—exactly as was done with COVID. It’s already happening. As Michael Snyder notes:

Over in the UK, residents of Oxfordshire will now need a special permit to go from one ‘zone’ of the city to another. But even if you have the permit, you will still only be allowed to go from one zone to another ‘maximum of 100 days per year.

Oxfordshire County Council yesterday approved plans to lock residents into one of six zones to “save the planet” from global warming. The latest stage in the “15 minute city” agenda is to place electronic gates on key roads in and out of the city, confining residents to their own neighbourhoods.

Under the new scheme if residents want to leave their zone they will need permission from the Council who gets to decide who is worthy of freedom and who isn’t. Under the new scheme residents will be allowed to leave their zone a maximum of 100 days per year, but in order to even gain this every resident will have to register their car details with the council who will then track their movements via smart cameras round the city.14

And here’s a 25-second clip from the WEF about developing a carbon footprint “tracker” that will monitor your movements and activities. More freedom lost.

(video backed up here)

It Gets Worse: The War on Food

One of the best methods of controlling a population is withholding food. Stalin demonstrated this during the Holodomor (1932-1933), when he starved some seven million Ukrainians to death through food confiscation.

Supposedly a major cause of Climate Change is cows and other livestock burping and farting. The fact that this never caused Climate Change before normally goes unmentioned. On seeing the following headline, an Irish-American lady told me: “In the 1840s the Irish had famine. Now they’re going to create it themselves.”

Article is here. Destroying food, at a time when food prices are soaring and supply chains diminished, is clearly not based on concern for humanity.

Meantime, the World Economic Forum is advocating production of artificial meat using 3-D printers:

(a comparable video is here)

The WEF also says we should eat mushrooms and algae instead of meat.

Bill Gates wants natural meat replaced with artificial meat, which (surprise, surprise) he is heavily invested in. As The Exposé reported in August 2022:

Bill Gates owns more farmland in the U.S. than any other private farmer, having purchased a total of 242,000 acres. Is the purchase of this land all part of his plan to force you to eat lab-grown synthetic meat?

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, the largest charitable foundation in the world, has an agricultural agenda that supports agrochemicals, patented seeds, fake meat and corporate control—interests that undermine regenerative, sustainable, small-scale farming. One of the key players in this agenda is the widespread adoption of synthetic meat.

Imitation meat company Impossible Foods was co-funded by Google, Jeff Bezos and Bill Gates, and Gates has made it clear that he believes switching to synthetic beef is the solution to reducing methane emissions that come from animals raised on concentrated animal feeding operations (CAFOs). , , , Gates: “I do think all rich countries should move to 100% synthetic beef.”15

I’m sure many of my readers have noticed that at their local supermarkets, plant-based foods are also heavily pushed, but they are not as healthy as they may sound.

Gates’ land ownership keeps rising:

Why does Gates want to control so much farmland? Considering his love for the artificial, he may be planning to use it to produce GMOs (genetically altered food). But given his fixation on controlling the size of the world’s population, one may reasonably ask if he even plans to leave much of the land fallow, producing little if any food.

If all this weren’t bad enough, the Netherlands government is planning to forcibly close 3,000 farms in order to meet new EU environmental standards.

(Article at Beef Central)

As Global Research reports:

Christianne van der Wal is the “Dutch Minister for Nitrogen and Nature Policy” (yes, that’s a real position in government). She and Prime Minister (and World Economic Forum member) Mark Rutte conjured a fake crisis that calls for “cutting nitrogen emissions” by up to 70% by 2030. . . . The current Dutch plan includes killing off 30% of the country’s livestock, which would put 30,000 farmers out of business and dramatically reduce meat supplies in Europe and beyond. The remaining farmers would be forced to cut nitrogen emissions by upwards of 95%, which would put them out of business too.

The Netherlands is the second-largest agricultural exporter in the world after the United States. It is the largest meat exporter in the European Union. Dutch farmers have been protesting almost non-stop since June. But mainstream media are barely covering it.16

But the war on fertilizer is not limited to the Netherlands, of course:

The Canadian government is also warring on fertilizer. In this 2-minute video, a Canadian farmer explains the dangers:

(video backed up here)

As Kit Knightly explains in OffGuardian, the Ukraine war is reducing not only food for the West, but the fertilizer needed for agriculture:

Russia is the largest exporter of wheat and other grains in the world, and these products are used not just for making food for humans, but also as animal feed. . . . Russia and Belarus are two of the biggest exporters of fertiliser and fertiliser-related products in the world, accounting for around 10 billion dollars worth of trade anually. So, the war in Ukraine (and the sanctions) are already hitting the fertiliser market hard, with prices hitting new all-time highs in March. . . .

Given that, it is very strange that America’s Union Pacific Railway has suddenly placed a limit on the number of fertiliser deliveries it will make, informing fertiliser giant CF Industries they will need to cut their train car use by as much as 20%.17

By advocating policies that destroy both livestock AND crops, the WEF globalists are setting up a worldwide famine—a catastrophic outcome they never discuss, just as they never mention the importance of freedom (except for Ukraine). Incidentally, in the book of Revelation, famine is one of the Four Horsemen of the Apocalypse.

On top of everything else, a baby formula shortage arose in 2022, and wouldn’t you know, it just so happens that Bill Gates is invested in an artificial breast milk company, BIOMILQ. An 11-miute Rumble video covers the story here.

This trucker has footage that she says shows baby formula being destroyed. While I cannot confirm its veracity (some suggest it could have been recalled tainted formula), I think the jury’s out on this one (1 minute):

(video backed up here)

But for those who think the Deep State would never stoop to directly destroying the food supply, here’s Tucker Carlson on the rash of food plant fires (4 minutes):

(video backed up here)

 

Here is a train wreck in Canada that derailed 43 cars carrying potash fertilizer, a stunning scene (under 1 minute):

(video backed up here)

In June 2022, Jim Hoft of The Gateway Pundit published a list of 100 fires, explosions, “accidents,” etc. that broke out in 2021-22 at food plants and food-related facilities.

And why is there a sudden egg shortage, making prices skyrocket? A prominent factor: Changes to the feed given to many chickens has caused them to stop laying eggs. A farmer explains (3 minutes):

(video backed up here)

Could Cooking Be Out Too? The Gas Stove Flap

The Biden administration has been contemplating banning gas stoves, though no such ban is in effect, and the administration backed off following severe backlash. An article by Slay News points out details suggesting that the idea of outlawing gas stoves originated with the World Economic Forum. Of course, the Deep State cannot shut off gas stoves remotely, as they could with electric stoves by disrupting the power grid.

 Still Worse: They Want You to Eat BUGS to “Save the Planet”

In this video, the WEF tells you to eat “mealworm burgers” (1 minute)

(video backed up here)

Here’s another WEF video, encouraging you to eat bread made from crickets (1 minute):


(video backed up here)

Knowing that celebrities impact public opinion, actress Nicole Kidman is recruited to demonstrate how delicious insects are (2 minutes):

(video backed up here)

Not to be outdone by Nicole, Kim Kardashian became an official taster for Beyond Meat, but her fans quickly noticed she was not actually eating the products in the commercial (3 minutes):

And as Global Research reports:

Insects are good for birds to eat, but not humans. As Dr. Joseph Mercola notes:
Alright, but what about insect protein? According to The Great Reset minions, insect protein is as good as it gets, nutrition-wise, and will protect the planet by eliminating the need for livestock, cutting down on agricultural land use and reversing climate change.

Not so fast. Perhaps someone didn’t think this through. (Or, they did, and any potential negative ramifications of an insect-based diet are actually their intended effects.) As it turns out, insects contain chitin, a highly inflammatory and allergy-inducing compound.

Some human tissues do have a chitin-destroying enzyme called chitinase, but it doesn’t always work well, in which case the chitin may trigger an immune response, allergic reactions.18

They’re After Your Pets Too

The WEF wants you to kill your pets (watch the first 3 minutes of the following 10-minute video):


Children are Bad for the Environment Too

Even eating people—synthetic cannibalism—is not off the table:

Give Up Your Home, Too

The WEF says you should downsize to midget-sized houses. Not only will you use less electricity—they even say it will make you less “racist”!

All this is summed in the following notorious WEF graphics:

Of course, everything WILL be owned—by the totalitarian world government, run by the oligarchs themselves. And that’s a perfect description of how communism has historically worked, despite its propaganda for public consumption, that it cared about “the proletariat” and “the people.”

Do Deep State Members Plan to Follow the Restrictions They Set for the Rest of Us?

No, and they never have. In his 2009 book Green Hell, Steve Milloy quoted California governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, who signed legislation raising the price of electricity on Californians to “fight global warming”:

Today, California will be a leader in the fight against global warming. I say the debate is over. We know the science, we see the threat and we know the time for action is now.19

But did Schwarzenegger apply this concern to himself? Milloy observed:

Tired of living in a hotel penthouse across from Sacramento’s Capitol Building, Schwarzenegger decided to live in his Los Angeles mansion and spend three hours a day commuting in his private Gulfstream jet. The Los Angeles Times noted that the plane “does nearly as much damage to the environment in one hour as a small car in a year.”20

And how about Al Gore, the high priest of the anti-global warming movement? Quoting Milloy:

It seems that the more Al Gore scares us, the richer he gets. Gore’s estimated net worth has ballooned from $1-2 million in 2000 to more than $100 million by December 2007. . . . Ordinarily I would applaud his success—except that it is largely built on his advocacy of reduced living standards for the rest of us.

Gore has traversed the world preaching the need for major lifestyle changes in order to forestall a global warming catastrophe. Just before the credits roll at the end of his dubious global warming documentary An Inconvenient Truth, viewers are asked starkly, “Are you ready to change the way you live?” On the movie’s website, Gore specifies what he has in mind: using less heating and air conditioning, buying fluorescent light bulbs, using less hot water, using a clothesline rather than a dryer, carpooling, flying less, buying cost-inefficient hybrid cars—in other words, downsizing your lifestyle.

In light of these entreaties, one might naturally assume that Gore had changed the way he lives. And one would be wrong. A month after his movie won the Academy Award for best documentary, the Tennessee Center for Policy Research reported that Gore’s mansion in Nashville, Tennessee consumed more than twenty times the national average of electricity. . . . Gore’s heated pool house alone used more than $500 in electricity every month.21

This “rules for thee, but not for me” policy for public figures also held true during the COVID crisis. Taking the UK as an example, Neil Ferguson of Imperial College, whose dubious computer model was the main basis for the US-UK lockdowns, resigned from his government advisory position after it was revealed that he was ignoring his own masking/social distancing rules by carrying on an affair with a married woman.22 Health Secretary Matt Hancock was forced to resign after he was discovered having an affair (caught on camera) with a married assistant—no masks or social distancing. Then there was the “Partygate” scandal of ex-Prime Minister Boris Johnson, who regularly violated the lockdown rules imposed on his fellow Britons.

When globalists gather to meet at the World Economic Forum—where Climate Change is often the major focus—most arrive in private jets;, more than 1,300 of them for a 2018 conference. One wonders how the carbon emissions of all those jets stack up against the emissions from the livestock, crops and pets they want to destroy.

The world’s biggest carbon emitter may be . . . Bill Gates. As The Expose noted:

The irony of Bill Gates—who lives in a 66,000-square-foot mansion and travels in a private jet that uses up to 486 gallons of fuel every hour—talking about how to save the environment isn’t lost on everyone.

The Nation criticized Gates’ contradictions, including the fact that, as a result of buying staggering amounts of farmland, he’s a major contributor to carbon emissions. His jet-setting lifestyle also makes him a carbon “super emitter”:

“According to a 2019 academic study looking at extreme carbon emissions from the jet-setting elite, Bill Gates’s extensive travel by private jet likely makes him one of the world’s top carbon contributors—a veritable super emitter. In the list of 10 celebrities investigated—including Jennifer Lopez, Paris Hilton, and Oprah Winfrey—Gates was the source of the most emissions.”23

Does anyone believe Gates will move out of his gigantic mansion into a mini-house to “save the planet”?
And if members of the “Deep State” refuse to give up their mansions, yachts and private jets to “save the planet,” does anyone think they’ll relinquish their luxurious meals and consume the insects they push on the rest of us?

(this meme refers to George Carlin’s comedy routine on “the big club.”

For More In-Depth Research

Major UK documentary The Great Global Warming Swindle (2007), citing numerous scientists. 1 hour, 13 minutes. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ&feature=youtu.be.

Nobel Laureate Ivar Giaever refutes the global warming hoax (2015) (30 minutes). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCy_UOjEir0.

Truthstream Media’s Davos Elite Plan to “Fundamentally Change the Way Food Is Produced and Consumed.” (58 minutes). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErkVO4wHKn4

NOTES

  1. Vernon Coleman, “Climate Change Is a Malicious, Dangerous Myth,” The Exposé, November 9, 2022, https://expose-news.com/2022/11/09/climate-change-is-a-malicious-dangerous-myth/
  2. “Historic Winter Outbreak,” February 11-20, 2021, National Weather Service, https://www.weather.gov/hgx/2021ValentineStorm.
  3.  “2021 Texas Power Crisis,” Wikipedia, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2021_Texas_power_crisis.
  4. Zbigniew Brzezinski, Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era (New York: Viking Press, 1970), 57.
  5. John Coleman, El Nino is Man Made (white paper) (Carson City, Nev.: World in Review, 2003), 1.
  6. Col. Tamzy J. House, et. al, Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025, August 1996, 3, 5-6, https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA333462.pdf.
  7. Claudia von Werlhof, Silvia Terribili, “Climate Disruption: Not Due to CO2,” Global Research, December 18, 2022, https://www.globalresearch.ca/climate-disruption-its-not-due-to-co2/5677036.
  8. F. William Engdahl, “The Great Zero Carbon Criminal Conspiracy,” New Eastern Outlook, May 2, 2021, https://journal-neo.org/2021/02/05/the-great-zero-carbon-criminal-conspiracy/.
  9. Patrick Moore and Lee Yun-Jeong, “Former Greenpeace Founder Patrick Moore Says Climate Change Based on False Narratives,” Global Research, September 6, 2022, https://www.globalresearch.ca/former-greenpeace-founder-patrick-moore-says-climate-change-based-false-narratives/5792687.
  10.  Chris Teague, “How Much Do EV Batteries Cost?” Autoweek, July 1, 2022, https://www.autoweek.com/news/a38658350/how-much-do-ev-batteries-cost.
  11. Kent Moss, “The Hidden Truths about Your Electric Car,” American Thinker, September 25, 2022, https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2022/09/the_hidden_truths_about_your_electric_car.html.
  12. Eco Central, “The Devastating Environmental Side Effects of the Electric Car Boom,” Global Research, December 3, 2022,“https://www.globalresearch.ca/un-warns-devastating-environmental-side-effects-electric-car-boom/5720496
  13.  Ibid.
  14. Michael Snyder, “Climate Change Lockdowns. Yup, They Are Actually Going There,” End of the American Dream, December 6, 2022, http://endoftheamericandream.com/climate-change-lockdowns-yup-they-are-actually-going-there/.
  15. “Bill Gates Is Quietly Carrying Out a Sinister Plan to Force You to Eat Fake Meat,” The Exposé, August 17, 2022, https://expose-news.com/2022/08/17/bill-gtes-sinister-plan-force-you-eat-fake-meat/.
  16. “The Phony Nitrogen Crisis: The Netherlands Is Ground Zero for Global Famine Agenda. Precipitating ‘30,000 Farmers Out of Business,’” Global Research, December 18, 2022, https://www.globalresearch.ca/netherlands-now-ground-zero-global-famine-agenda-government-bill-gates-create-phony-nitrogen-crisis-destroy-countrys-agricultural-sector/5789125.
  17. Kit Knightly, “Five Signs They Are CREATING a Food Crisis,” OffGuardian, April 25, 2022, https://off-guardian.org/2022/04/25/5-signs-they-are-creating-a-food-crisis/.
  18. Joseph Mercola, “Ultraprocessed Food—The Worst Choice for Planet and Health,” Global Research, September 10, 2022, https://www.globalresearch.ca/ultraprocessed-food-worst-choice-planet-health/5792958.
  19. Steve Milloy, Green Hell (Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 2009), 152.
  20. Ibid.
  21. Ibid., 146-47,
  22. Louisa Wells, “Exclusive: Government Scientist Neil Ferguson Resigns after Breaking Lockdown Rules to Meet His Married Lover,” The Telegraph, May 5, 2020, https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/05/05/exclusive-government-scientist-neil-ferguson-resigns-breaking/.
  23. “Bill Gates Is Quietly Carrying Out a Sinister Plan to Force You to Eat Fake Meat,” The Exposé, August 17, 2022, https://expose-news.com/2022/08/17/bill-gtes-sinister-plan-force-you-eat-fake-meat/
Facebook
Twitter
WhatsApp
Telegram
James Perloff

James Perloff

James has been writing for alternative media since 1985 when he began contributing to The New American magazine. He is the author of six books, the subjects of which range from COVID-19 to political history to creationism.

You Might Also Like